State v. Oie
Opinion
Filed 9/27/05 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2005 ND159
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Anthony James Moore, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20050133
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Frank L. Racek, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Anthony J. Moore, pro se, North Dakota State Penitentiary, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5521, defendant and appellant.
Birch P. Burdick, State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for plaintiff and appellee.
State v. Moore
No. 20050133
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Anthony James Moore appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Moore argues: (1) he was improperly required to register as a sexual offender for life under a statute that does not apply to him; (2) he was required to register as a sexual offender erroneously because he is "actually innocent"; and, (3) he was denied due process by being sentenced to pay restitution without receiving notice.
[¶2] Moore's claims are frivolous and completely without merit. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2005 ND 160 (State v. Oie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.