State v. O'Hare

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. O'Hare

105 A. 892, 118 Me. 477, 1919 Me. LEXIS 29

DecidedJanuary 2, 1919

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A. 892 (State v. O'Hare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. O'Hare, 105 A. 892, 118 Me. 477, 1919 Me. LEXIS 29 (Me. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

This is a com-, plaint for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors. The case is before this court on respondents’ exceptions to the refusal of the presiding Justice to direct a verdict in their favor at the close of the evidence. The exceptions are without merit. The verdict of guilty found by the jury was fully sustained by the testimony and by the circumstataces of the case, and the presiding Justice would not have been warranted in ordering an acquittal. Exceptions overruled. Judgment for the State against both respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is a com-, plaint for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors. The case is before this court on respondents’ exceptions to the refusal of the presiding Justice to direct a verdict in their favor at the close of the evidence. The exceptions are without merit. The verdict of guilty found by the jury was fully sustained by the testimony and by the circumstataces of the case, and the presiding Justice would not have been warranted in ordering an acquittal. Exceptions overruled. Judgment for the State against both respondents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A. 892, 118 Me. 477, 1919 Me. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ohare-me-1919.