State v. O'Hara

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. O'Hara

928 S.W.2d 901, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1556, 1996 WL 523502

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 17, 1996

DocketNos. 66362, 69046

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 928 S.W.2d 901 (State v. O'Hara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. O'Hara, 928 S.W.2d 901, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1556, 1996 WL 523502 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Timothy William O’Hara, appeals the judgment entered upon his convictions by a jury of involuntary manslaughter, § 565.024 RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015 RSMo 1986. Defendant was sentenced to seven years for involuntary manslaughter consecutive to life imprisonment for armed criminal action.

The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. However, defendant fails to raise any points on appeal relating to the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Where a defendant appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion, but fails to raise any points related to the denial of that motion in the brief on appeal, the point is considered abandoned. State v. Link, 916 S.W.2d 385, 386 n. 1 (Mo.App.1996); State v. Nelson, 818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App.1991).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI