State v. O'Guist

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. O'Guist

579 P.2d 871, 34 Or. App. 693, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2559

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 30, 1978

DocketDA 127729, CA 10139

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 579 P.2d 871 (State v. O'Guist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. O'Guist, 579 P.2d 871, 34 Or. App. 693, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2559 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, upon trial by jury, was convicted of sexual abuse in the second degree, ORS 163.415. His principal assignment of error is that the court erred in permitting two witnesses to relate out-of-court statements of the complaining witness. The error, if any, was harmless because defendant’s version of the facts as voluntarily stated to a police officer and another witness was substantially the same as the out-of-court statements of the complaining witness.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, upon trial by jury, was convicted of sexual abuse in the second degree, ORS 163.415. His principal assignment of error is that the court erred in permitting two witnesses to relate out-of-court statements of the complaining witness. The error, if any, was harmless because defendant’s version of the facts as voluntarily stated to a police officer and another witness was substantially the same as the out-of-court statements of the complaining witness.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

579 P.2d 871, 34 Or. App. 693, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oguist-orctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack