State v. O'Guist
579 P.2d 871, 34 Or. App. 693, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2559
Opinion
Defendant, upon trial by jury, was convicted of sexual abuse in the second degree, ORS 163.415. His principal assignment of error is that the court erred in permitting two witnesses to relate out-of-court statements of the complaining witness. The error, if any, was harmless because defendant’s version of the facts as voluntarily stated to a police officer and another witness was substantially the same as the out-of-court statements of the complaining witness.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. O'Guist, 579 P.2d 871, 34 Or. App. 693, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2559 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
579 P.2d 871 (State v. O'Guist) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Mitchell
617 P.2d 298 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)