State v. O'Grady
This text of 73 N.W. 1102 (State v. O'Grady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This defendant was found guilty of a contempt of court as an agent or servant of McNulty, the defendant in the case of State v. McNulty, 7 N. D. 169, 73 N. W. Rep. 87. That case must rule this. It is urged that the evidence fails to show that O’Grady took part in the proceedings which resulted in retaking the property from the officer, and destroying the same, or that he knew that any injunction had issued, or that said property had been seized. We need only say that, after a careful perusal of the evidence, we are satisfied with the finding of the trial court on these points.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 N.W. 1102, 7 N.D. 171, 1897 N.D. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ogrady-nd-1897.