State v. Oglester

830 So. 2d 124, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12023, 2002 WL 1906206
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 21, 2002·No. No. 3D02-122·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the youthful offender sentence imposed on the defendant, Jig-nore Oglester, in lieu of a mandatory ten-year sentence under the “10-20-Life” scheme mandated by the firearm enhancement statute, section 775.087, Florida Statutes (2000). We affirm adopting the rationale of our sister court in State v. Wooten, 782 So.2d 408 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001):

Since we find that the 10/20/Life statute contains no language to supercede the youthful offender sentence and because prior cases have held that minimum mandatory sentencing is not applicable. when one is sentenced as a youthful offender, we affirm the appel-lee’s sentence.

Wooten, 782 So.2d at 409; Beatrice v. State, No. 01-180 (Fla. 4th DCA July 24, 2002); State v. Fernandez, 819 So.2d 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Darrow v. State, 789 So.2d 552 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); State v. Bynes, 784 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Oglester, 830 So. 2d 124, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12023, 2002 WL 1906206 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

830 So. 2d 124 (State v. Oglester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pacheco-Velasquez v. State
208 So. 3d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
State v. Drury
829 So. 2d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Deakter v. Menendez
830 So. 2d 124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)