State v. Offield

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Offield

386 S.W.3d 930, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1647, 2012 WL 6689917

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 26, 2012·No. No. WD 74853·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Rowdy M. Offield was convicted of attempted escape from confinement- in violation of § 575.210, RSMo, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Saline County. Offield appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Rowdy M. Offield was convicted of attempted escape from confinement- in violation of § 575.210, RSMo, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Saline County. Offield appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Offield, 386 S.W.3d 930, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1647, 2012 WL 6689917 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

386 S.W.3d 930 (State v. Offield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.