State v. Odum

468 S.E.2d 245, 343 N.C. 116, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 164
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 4, 1996
DocketNo. 368A95
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 468 S.E.2d 245 (State v. Odum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Odum, 468 S.E.2d 245, 343 N.C. 116, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 164 (N.C. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Judge Greene, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded to that court for further remand to the Superior Court, Wake County, for a trial at which the seized evidence in question is suppressed.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Fisher
539 S.E.2d 677 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
State v. Hendrickson
476 S.E.2d 389 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 S.E.2d 245, 343 N.C. 116, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-odum-nc-1996.