State v. Odum

468 S.E.2d 245, 343 N.C. 116, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 164
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 4, 1996·No. No. 368A95·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Judge Greene, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded to that court for further remand to the Superior Court, Wake County, for a trial at which the seized evidence in question is suppressed.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Odum, 468 S.E.2d 245, 343 N.C. 116, 1996 N.C. LEXIS 164 (N.C. 1996).

468 S.E.2d 245 (State v. Odum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Fisher
539 S.E.2d 677 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
State v. Hendrickson
476 S.E.2d 389 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)