State v. Odom

166 So. 2d 741, 246 La. 707, 1964 La. LEXIS 2665
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedAugust 20, 1964
DocketNo. 47444
StatusPublished

This text of 166 So. 2d 741 (State v. Odom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Odom, 166 So. 2d 741, 246 La. 707, 1964 La. LEXIS 2665 (La. 1964).

Opinion

In re: Roger Dale Odom applying for writs of certiorari and mandamus.

The application is denied. Considering the showing made in the application and the written response of the trial judge to the application herein, it does not appear that the trial judge erred in finding the presumption great as to the crime charged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 So. 2d 741, 246 La. 707, 1964 La. LEXIS 2665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-odom-la-1964.