State v. Odermann
This text of 2016 ND 51 (State v. Odermann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 3/15/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2016 ND 51
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Michael Kendrick Odermann, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20150216
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jerod E. Tufte, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Frederick R. Fremgen (on brief), State’s Attorney, 511 Second Avenue S.E., Jamestown, ND 58401, for plaintiff and appellee.
Mark T. Blumer (on brief), P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, ND 58106, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Odermann
[¶1] Michael Odermann appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary and two counts of theft of property. He argues the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the convictions. We conclude there was substantial evidence to support the verdicts and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 ND 51, 876 N.W.2d 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-odermann-nd-2016.