State v. Oden
This text of 600 S.E.2d 855 (State v. Oden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Mack ODEN.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mack Oden, Pro Se.
Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Mitchell D. Norton, District Attorney, for State.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th day of June 2004 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Beaufort County:
"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 2nd day of July 2004."
Upon consideration of the Notice of Appeal in the Matter of Motion for Post Conviction Discovery under Brady from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 25th day of June 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of July 2004."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
600 S.E.2d 855, 2004 WL 1638276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oden-nc-2004.