State v. Oden

271 S.W.3d 62, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1512, 2008 WL 5447538
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 18, 2008
DocketED 90334
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 271 S.W.3d 62 (State v. Oden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Oden, 271 S.W.3d 62, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1512, 2008 WL 5447538 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Isreal Oden appeals the circuit court’s judgment upon his convictions after a bench trial for second degree murder and armed criminal action. Oden alleges that the court erred in overruling his motion for acquittal because the State’s evidence was insufficient to disprove self-defense. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for them use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oden v. State
320 S.W.3d 198 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)
State v. Wilson
271 S.W.3d 62 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 S.W.3d 62, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1512, 2008 WL 5447538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oden-moctapp-2008.