State v. OCTAVIO

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. OCTAVIO

282 S.W.3d 415, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 603, 2009 WL 1285976

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 12, 2009

DocketWD 69081

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 282 S.W.3d 415 (State v. OCTAVIO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. OCTAVIO, 282 S.W.3d 415, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 603, 2009 WL 1285976 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Luis Octavio appeals the circuit court’s judgment, after a jury trial, of his conviction on one count of attempted burglary in the second degree. His only point on appeal is that the circuit court erred in overruling his motion for acquittal because the State failed to prove an essential element of its prima facie case for the offense of burglary: that he engaged in such conduct for the purpose of committing the crime of stealing. Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Luis Octavio appeals the circuit court’s judgment, after a jury trial, of his conviction on one count of attempted burglary in the second degree. His only point on appeal is that the circuit court erred in overruling his motion for acquittal because the State failed to prove an essential element of its prima facie case for the offense of burglary: that he engaged in such conduct for the purpose of committing the crime of stealing. Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 S.W.3d 415, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 603, 2009 WL 1285976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-octavio-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack