State v. . O'Connor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . O'Connor

29 S.E.2d 352, 224 N.C. 854, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 315

DecidedMarch 22, 1944

StatusPublished

This text of 29 S.E.2d 352 (State v. . O'Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . O'Connor, 29 S.E.2d 352, 224 N.C. 854, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 315 (N.C. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe only exceptive assignments of error contained in the record are directed to. the judgment against the individual defendants. We do not concede that a judgment upon an appearance bond does not bear interest. G. S., 24-5 (C. S., 2309). Even so, the individual defendants are the ones affected. If the defendant Bond Company is required to pay interest it will be required to do so by virtue of the terms of the statute. It cannot present here a contention in behalf of the other defendants. There is no merit in the appeal. The judgment below is

• Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe only exceptive assignments of error contained in the record are directed to. the judgment against the individual defendants. We do not concede that a judgment upon an appearance bond does not bear interest. G. S., 24-5 (C. S., 2309). Even so, the individual defendants are the ones affected. If the defendant Bond Company is required to pay interest it will be required to do so by virtue of the terms of the statute. It cannot present here a contention in behalf of the other defendants. There is no merit in the appeal. The judgment below is

• Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 S.E.2d 352, 224 N.C. 854, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oconnor-nc-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack