State v. . O'Connor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . O'Connor

29 S.E.2d 352, 224 N.C. 854, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 315

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 22, 1944·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe only exceptive assignments of error contained in the record are directed to. the judgment against the individual defendants. We do not concede that a judgment upon an appearance bond does not bear interest. G. S., 24-5 (C. S., 2309). Even so, the individual defendants are the ones affected. If the defendant Bond Company is required to pay interest it will be required to do so by virtue of the terms of the statute. It cannot present here a contention in behalf of the other defendants. There is no merit in the appeal. The judgment below is

• Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe only exceptive assignments of error contained in the record are directed to. the judgment against the individual defendants. We do not concede that a judgment upon an appearance bond does not bear interest. G. S., 24-5 (C. S., 2309). Even so, the individual defendants are the ones affected. If the defendant Bond Company is required to pay interest it will be required to do so by virtue of the terms of the statute. It cannot present here a contention in behalf of the other defendants. There is no merit in the appeal. The judgment below is

• Affirmed.

State v. . O'Connor, 29 S.E.2d 352, 224 N.C. 854, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 315 (N.C. 1944).

Pincite

29 S.E.2d 352 (State v. . O'Connor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related