State v. Ocasio

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Ocasio

723 A.2d 322, 247 Conn. 947, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 466

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedDecember 7, 1998

Docket16049

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 723 A.2d 322 (State v. Ocasio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ocasio, 723 A.2d 322, 247 Conn. 947, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 466 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 748 (AC 16474), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that literal, rather than substantial, compliance is required in order for a defendant’s plea of guilty to be valid under Practice Book § 39-20?

“2. If the answer to the first question is no, was there substantial compliance with Practice Book § 39-20?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 748 (AC 16474), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that literal, rather than substantial, compliance is required in order for a defendant’s plea of guilty to be valid under Practice Book § 39-20?

“2. If the answer to the first question is no, was there substantial compliance with Practice Book § 39-20?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

723 A.2d 322, 247 Conn. 947, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ocasio-conn-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack