State v. O'Brien
This text of 85 N.W. 1135 (State v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order denying a motion to make tbe complaint more definite and certain. Plaintiff’s counsel claims tbe order is nonappealable and moves to dismiss. In American Book Co. v. Kingdom Pub. Co., 71 Minn. 363, 73 N. W. 1089, we expressly disapprove tbe rule laid down in Pugb v. Winona & St. P. R. Co., 29 Minn. 390, 13 N. W. 189, as to tbe appealability of sucb an order, and with a clear intimation that it would not be thereafter followed. We now expressly overrule tbe Pugb case, and bold that, as such an order relates to a matter of procedure and may be reviewed on an appeal from tbe judgment, if one is obtained against tbe defendants, it is not appealable under our statute. The appeal is dismissed, but without statutory costs.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 N.W. 1135, 83 Minn. 6, 1901 Minn. LEXIS 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-obrien-minn-1901.