State v. O'Brien

85 N.W. 1135, 83 Minn. 6, 1901 Minn. LEXIS 608
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 12, 1901·No. Nos. 12,545 — (11)·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to make tbe complaint more definite and certain. Plaintiff’s counsel claims tbe order is nonappealable and moves to dismiss. In American Book Co. v. Kingdom Pub. Co., 71 Minn. 363, 73 N. W. 1089, we expressly disapprove tbe rule laid down in Pugb v. Winona & St. P. R. Co., 29 Minn. 390, 13 N. W. 189, as to tbe appealability of sucb an order, and with a clear intimation that it would not be thereafter followed. We now expressly overrule tbe Pugb case, and bold that, as such an order relates to a matter of procedure and may be reviewed on an appeal from tbe judgment, if one is obtained against tbe defendants, it is not appealable under our statute. The appeal is dismissed, but without statutory costs.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. O'Brien, 85 N.W. 1135, 83 Minn. 6, 1901 Minn. LEXIS 608 (Mich. 1901).

85 N.W. 1135 (State v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Firle
253 N.W. 889 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)
Lundblad v. Erickson
230 N.W. 473 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1930)
Morford v. Pyle
215 N.W. 690 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1927)
Lowe v. Nixon
212 N.W. 896 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1927)
Baer v. Waseca Milling Company
171 N.W. 767 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1919)
Lovering v. Webb Publishing Co.
120 N.W. 688 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1909)
Johnson v. Great Northern Railway Co.
97 N.W. 546 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1903)