State v. O'Brien

550 A.2d 66, 1988 Me. LEXIS 283
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedNovember 8, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 550 A.2d 66 (State v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. O'Brien, 550 A.2d 66, 1988 Me. LEXIS 283 (Me. 1988).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Defendants Joseph O’Brien and Gilman McDuffee appeal from convictions of theft, following a jury trial in Superior Court (Lincoln County, Bradford, J.). On appeal defendants argue that there is insufficient evidence to support the jury finding that the stolen goods had a value in excess of $5,000 as required for a Class B crime. 17-A M.R.S.A. § 362(2)(A) (1983). In this case, the court properly admitted the testimony of the owner who testified to a market value in excess of $9,000. State v. Thibeault, 390 A.2d 1095, 1102 (Me.1978). Such evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the State, supports the jury’s finding of value beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

JUDGMENTS AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Thibeault
390 A.2d 1095 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1978)
State v. Barry
495 A.2d 825 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
550 A.2d 66, 1988 Me. LEXIS 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-obrien-me-1988.