State v. OBERHART

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. OBERHART

294 S.W.3d 138, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1483, 2009 WL 3260001

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 13, 2009

DocketED 92140

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 294 S.W.3d 138 (State v. OBERHART) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. OBERHART, 294 S.W.3d 138, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1483, 2009 WL 3260001 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Patrick A. Oberhart appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first degree murder and armed criminal action. We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Patrick A. Oberhart appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first degree murder and armed criminal action. We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 S.W.3d 138, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1483, 2009 WL 3260001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oberhart-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack