State v. O'BANNON

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. O'BANNON

169 S.W.3d 559, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1251, 2005 WL 2007153

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 23, 2005

DocketED 85395

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 S.W.3d 559 (State v. O'BANNON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. O'BANNON, 169 S.W.3d 559, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1251, 2005 WL 2007153 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Timothy O’Bannon, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary in the second degree. The trial court sentenced defendant, as a prior and persistent offender, to four years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Timothy O’Bannon, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary in the second degree. The trial court sentenced defendant, as a prior and persistent offender, to four years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 S.W.3d 559, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1251, 2005 WL 2007153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-obannon-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack