State v. Oatman

2024 Ohio 5874
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 16, 2024
Docket2024-L-084
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 Ohio 5874 (State v. Oatman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Oatman, 2024 Ohio 5874 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Oatman, 2024-Ohio-5874.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2024-L-084 CITY OF PAINESVILLE,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the Painesville Municipal Court - vs -

SABREL B. OATMAN, Trial Court No. 2024 CRB 00262

Defendant-Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Decided: December 16, 2024 Judgment: Appeal dismissed

James R. O’Leary, Painesville City Prosecutor, 77 North St. Clair Street, Suite 100, Painesville, OH 44077 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Sabrel B. Oatman, pro se, 4196 Flossy Lane, Perry, OH 44081 (Defendant-Appellant).

EUGENE A. LUCCI, P.J.

{¶1} On October 23, 2024, a notice of appeal and docketing statement were filed

in the Painesville Municipal Court. On October 24, 2024, appellant filed a “Motion for

Leave to File Delayed Appeal” along with copies of the October 23, 2024 notice of appeal

and docketing statement. The notice of appeal indicates that appellant, Sabrel B. Oatman,

wishes to appeal from an order issued in Painesville M.C. Case No. 2024-CRB-00262.

However, the notice of appeal and docketing statement are not signed by appellant, but

were signed by someone else who is not an attorney. {¶2} App.R. 5(A) requires that a notice of appeal shall be filed concurrently with

any motion for leave to file a delayed appeal. “The original of every . . . document filed

with this court shall be signed by an attorney representing the party on whose behalf the

document is filed.” Loc.R. 4(A). Only a licensed attorney may file pleadings on behalf of

another party in court. R.C. 4705.01; Karnofel v. Montgomery, 2009-Ohio-6037, ¶ 15-16

(11th Dist.); see also Kessler v. Totus Tuus, L.L.C., 2009-Ohio-1147 (11th Dist.). Loc.R.

4(A) further provides that when a party is not represented by counsel, the party is required

to sign his or her own name on all pleadings.

{¶3} The October 23, 2024 notice of appeal was not signed by appellant or a

licensed attorney. Instead, the notice is signed by appellant’s mother, Au’Dree M.

Calhoun-Ekwuenechi, who is not an attorney.

{¶4} Appellant has not submitted a notice of appeal signed by either a licensed

attorney or himself. Therefore, appellant’s motion for leave to file a delayed appeal is

overruled, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

{¶5} We note that appellant is not barred from filing a new motion for leave to file

a delayed appeal along with a signed notice of appeal that complies with the Ohio Rules

of Appellate Procedure and the local rules of this court.

{¶6} Appeal dismissed.

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,

ROBERT J. PATTON, J.,

concur.

Case No. 2024-L-084

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kessler v. Totus Tuus, 2008-A-0011 (3-13-2009)
2009 Ohio 1147 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 Ohio 5874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oatman-ohioctapp-2024.