State v. Oakley

186 S.E.2d 515, 13 N.C. App. 651, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2306
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 23, 1972
DocketNo. 7219SC190
StatusPublished

This text of 186 S.E.2d 515 (State v. Oakley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Oakley, 186 S.E.2d 515, 13 N.C. App. 651, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2306 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant’s court appointed counsel with commendable candor states that he has carefully examined the record in this case and can find no error, but asks this court to review the same. That we have done but find no reason to disturb the order appealed from.

Affirmed.

Judges Campbell and Graham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 S.E.2d 515, 13 N.C. App. 651, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oakley-ncctapp-1972.