State v. Nyveldt
This text of 694 A.2d 839 (State v. Nyveldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The defendant, Albert M. Nyveldt, appeals from a judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of three counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 and three counts [614]*614of sexual assault in the fourth degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-73a (a) (1) (A).
Having reviewed the record and briefs of the parties, we find that the claims of the defendant are without merit. The record discloses more than sufficient evidence to sustain the defendant’s conviction for risk of injury to a child as charged in count one of the information.1
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
694 A.2d 839, 45 Conn. App. 613, 1997 Conn. App. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nyveldt-connappct-1997.