State v. Nystrom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Nystrom

292 N.W.2d 287, 1980 Minn. LEXIS 1390

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 2, 1980·No. No. 50906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Ramsey County District Court, Juvenile Division, granting the state’s motion pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 260.125 (1978) to refer the juvenile in question, who is now 18 years old, for prosecution as an adult. This appeal raises the issue of whether the district court clearly erred in its findings or abused its discretion in determining that the public safety would be endangered by keeping the juvenile in the juvenile court system. We hold that the juvenile court did not clearly err in any. of its findings or abuse its discretion in its determination on the issue of dangerousness. In the Matter of the Welfare of K.P.H., 289 N.W.2d 722 (Minn.1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Ramsey County District Court, Juvenile Division, granting the state’s motion pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 260.125 (1978) to refer the juvenile in question, who is now 18 years old, for prosecution as an adult. This appeal raises the issue of whether the district court clearly erred in its findings or abused its discretion in determining that the public safety would be endangered by keeping the juvenile in the juvenile court system. We hold that the juvenile court did not clearly err in any. of its findings or abuse its discretion in its determination on the issue of dangerousness. In the Matter of the Welfare of K.P.H., 289 N.W.2d 722 (Minn.1980).

Affirmed.

State v. Nystrom, 292 N.W.2d 287, 1980 Minn. LEXIS 1390 (Mich. 1980).

Pincite

292 N.W.2d 287 (State v. Nystrom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related