State v. Nur
This text of 2017 ND 43 (State v. Nur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 3/7/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2017 ND 43
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Ibrahim Hassan Nur, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20160257
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Tristan J. Van de Streek, Assistant State’s Attorney, Cass County Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for plaintiff and appellee.
Mark T. Blumer (on brief), P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, ND 58106, and Kiara C. Kraus-Parr (argued), 424 Demers Avenue, Grand Forks, ND 58201, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Nur
[¶1] Ibrahim Nur appealed the district court’s judgment after a jury found him guilty of burglary. Nur argued the State provided insufficient evidence to identify him as a participant in the burglary. Without bringing a motion under Rule 29, N.D.R.Crim.P., this Court is restricted to reviewing the record for obvious error. State v. Yineman , 2002 ND 145, ¶ 21, 651 N.W.2d 648. We find no obvious error in the trial. We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 ND 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nur-nd-2017.