State v. Nunley

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Nunley

476 S.W.3d 321, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1210, 2015 WL 7444876

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 24, 2015

DocketNo. ED 101631

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 476 S.W.3d 321 (State v. Nunley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Nunley, 476 S.W.3d 321, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1210, 2015 WL 7444876 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Travis Nunley appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction, after a jury trial, of one count of. second-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.021, RSMo (2000),¹ one count of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020, and two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We conclude no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Crim. PRO. 30.25(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Travis Nunley appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction, after a jury trial, of one count of. second-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.021, RSMo (2000),¹ one count of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020, and two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We conclude no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Crim. PRO. 30.25(b) (2015).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 S.W.3d 321, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1210, 2015 WL 7444876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nunley-moctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack