State v. Nunez

26 La. Ann. 605
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 15, 1874·No. No. 832·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Wyly, J.

The defendant having been convicted of larceny appeals from the judgment sentencing him to the penitentiary for twelve months. The point upon which he relies in this court, is the objection set up in a motion in arrest of judgment, that Charles W. DuKoy, who filed the information as district attorney pro tempore, was not appointed to that office, and consequently his official act was a nullity.

We think the court did not err íd holding that this objection comes too late. If the exception is a good one, it should have been pleaded before going into the trial. Besides, in a motion in arrest of judgment, only errors patent on the face of the record can be examined.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Nunez, 26 La. Ann. 605 (La. 1874).

26 La. Ann. 605 (State v. Nunez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Steward
975 So. 2d 829 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2008)
State v. Emile
74 So. 163 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916)
State v. Stephney
68 So. 949 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1915)