Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Nucklos

State v. Nucklos

872 N.E.2d 949, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1507
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 29, 2007
Docket2007-0754
StatusPublished

This text of 872 N.E.2d 949 (State v. Nucklos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Nucklos, 872 N.E.2d 949, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1507 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

Clark App. No. 06CA0023, 171 Ohio App.3d 38, 2007-Ohio-1025. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and Cdpp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Motion for admission pro hac vice of John P. Flannery II is denied for failure to comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. I(2)(B). Sua sponte, appellee’s memorandum in response is stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Nucklos
869 N.E.2d 674 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
872 N.E.2d 949, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nucklos-ohio-2007.