State v. Nozka

762 A.2d 215, 165 N.J. 598, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1564
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 13, 2000·Published

Opinion

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily affirmed in part and reversed in part, the Court affirming the judgment of the Appellate Division insofar as it finds inadequately stated the sentencing court’s basis for imposing consecutive sentences and a period of parole ineligibility and reversing the Appellate Division’s exercise of original jurisdiction to modify defendant’s sentence, State v. Kromphold, 162 N.J. 345, 744 A.2d 640 (2000); and it is further

ORDERED that the matter is remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, Bergen County, for the resentencing of the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Nozka, 762 A.2d 215, 165 N.J. 598, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1564 (N.J. 2000).

762 A.2d 215 (State v. Nozka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kromphold
744 A.2d 640 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2000)