State v. Nowlan

64 Me. 531
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 64 Me. 531 (State v. Nowlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Nowlan, 64 Me. 531 (Me. 1874).

Opinion

Walton, J.

A special verdict is not necessary in a prosecution for keeping intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same in violation of law. A general verdict- of guilty or not guilty is all that is usual or necessary in such cases. Nor is it necessary that the complaint should contain an averment that the complainant “has probable cause to believe” that the defendant keeps liquors with intent to sell them in violation of law. Neither the statute nor the form enacted by the legislature requires such an averment. It is enough for the complainant to state that he does in fact believe that intoxicating liquors are thus kept by the defendant. It is not necessary for him to add that his belief is a reasonable one. R. S., c. 27, § 35, and form on page 315.

Exceptions overruled.

Appleton, C. J., Dickerson, Barrows and Peters, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallace v. State
157 N.E. 657 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1927)
Chapin v. State
296 S.W. 1095 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
State v. Hall
279 S.W. 102 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1926)
State v. Voelker
242 P. 6 (Washington Supreme Court, 1926)
State v. Kees
114 S.E. 617 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1922)
State ex rel. Hodge v. Gordon
163 P. 772 (Washington Supreme Court, 1917)
Rose v. State
87 N.E. 103 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Me. 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nowlan-me-1874.