State v. Novak

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Novak

93 Ohio St. 3d 1299

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 25, 2001

Docket01-1473

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1299 (State v. Novak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Novak, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1299 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 78482. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. It appears from the records of this court that appellee/cross-appellant has not filed a memorandum in response and in support of cross-appeal, due September 13, 2001, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute the cross-appeal with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the cross-appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed, sua sponte.

The appeal of the state of Ohio remains pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 78482. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. It appears from the records of this court that appellee/cross-appellant has not filed a memorandum in response and in support of cross-appeal, due September 13, 2001, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute the cross-appeal with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the cross-appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed, sua sponte.

The appeal of the state of Ohio remains pending.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. 3d 1299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-novak-ohio-2001.