State v. Northern
This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1295 (State v. Northern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Allen App. No. 1-01-01. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed August 14, 2001, at page 2:
“Is a motion made pursuant to Crim.R. 32.1 subject to the time restraints of R.C. 2953.21 and R.C. 2953.23?”
The conflict cases are State v. Talley (Jan. 30,1998), Montgomery App. No. 16479, unreported, 1998 WL 31516, and State v. Cale (Mar. 23, 2001), Lake App. No. 2000-L-034, unreported, 2001 WL 285794.
Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 01-1375, State v. Northern, Allen App. No. 1-01-01.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 Ohio St. 3d 1295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-northern-ohio-2001.