State v. Norris
217 S.E.2d 673, 288 N.C. 249, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 954
This text of 217 S.E.2d 673 (State v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Norris, 217 S.E.2d 673, 288 N.C. 249, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 954 (N.C. 1975).
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Jimmy Austin NORRIS.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
H. Spencer Barrow, for defendant.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Jerry J. Rutledge, Associate Atty., for the State.
Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 26 N.C.App. 259, 215 S.E.2d 875. Denied. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Norris
215 S.E.2d 875 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
217 S.E.2d 673, 288 N.C. 249, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-norris-nc-1975.