State v. Norris

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Norris

369 S.W.3d 83, 2012 WL 2320768, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 830

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 19, 2012·No. No. ED 96745·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Norris (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of two counts of possession of a controlled substance.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Norris (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of two counts of possession of a controlled substance.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Norris, 369 S.W.3d 83, 2012 WL 2320768, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 830 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

369 S.W.3d 83 (State v. Norris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.