State v. Norman

486 A.2d 160, 1985 Me. LEXIS 613
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJanuary 15, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 486 A.2d 160 (State v. Norman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Norman, 486 A.2d 160, 1985 Me. LEXIS 613 (Me. 1985).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

Harold F. Norman appeals from his conviction in Superior Court, Cumberland County, of gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(B), and unlawful sexual contact, § 255(1)(C). He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his [161]*161conviction. This -case is governed by our recent decision in State v. Decesere, 451 A.2d 636 (Me.1982), wherein we held that the essentially uncorroborated testimony of a young child victim, if not contradictory, unreasonable, or incredible is sufficient to sustain a verdict. Upon careful review of this record, we cannot say that no finder of fact could rationally have found the defendant guilty.

The entry is:

Judgments affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Decesere
451 A.2d 636 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
486 A.2d 160, 1985 Me. LEXIS 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-norman-me-1985.