State v. Nordone

342 So. 2d 811, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4625
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 4, 1976
DocketNo. 47147
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 342 So. 2d 811 (State v. Nordone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Nordone, 342 So. 2d 811, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4625 (Fla. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court, and we issued the writ. Upon further consideration, however, we have determined that we are without • jurisdiction in this cause. The writ is therefore discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fla. Interconnect Tel. v. Fla. Public Serv.
342 So. 2d 811 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
342 So. 2d 811, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nordone-fla-1976.