State v. Nordone

342 So. 2d 811, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4625
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 4, 1976·No. No. 47147·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court, and we issued the writ. Upon further consideration, however, we have determined that we are without • jurisdiction in this cause. The writ is therefore discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Nordone, 342 So. 2d 811, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4625 (Fla. 1976).

342 So. 2d 811 (State v. Nordone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fla. Interconnect Tel. v. Fla. Public Serv.
342 So. 2d 811 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)