State v. Noorzai

423 P.3d 817, 293 Or. App. 432
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 15, 2018·No. A159866·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*433Following the issuance of our opinion in this case, State v. Noorzai , 292 Or. App. 248, 423 P.3d 742 (2018), defendant moved to dismiss his appeal. In its response, the state objected to dismissal; the state alternatively moved on equitable grounds that we vacate our opinion. Defendant does not oppose vacatur. We agree that equitable considerations support vacatur in this case. See Kerr v. Bradbury , 340 Or. 241, 247-50, 131 P.3d 737, adh'd to on recons. , 341 Or. 200, 140 P.3d 1131 (2006). Accordingly, we grant defendant's motion to dismiss his appeal and the state's motion to vacate the opinion.

Appeal dismissed; the court's opinion in State v. Noorzai , 292 Or. App. 248, 423 P.3d 742 (2018), is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Noorzai, 423 P.3d 817, 293 Or. App. 432 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).

423 P.3d 817 (State v. Noorzai) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sassarini
452 P.3d 457 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2019)