State v. Noble
770 P.2d 57, 307 Or. 506, 1989 Ore. LEXIS 110
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 14, 1989
DocketTC 86C-22355; CA A47047; SC S35807
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases
This text of 770 P.2d 57 (State v. Noble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Noble, 770 P.2d 57, 307 Or. 506, 1989 Ore. LEXIS 110 (Or. 1989).
Opinion
The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in imposing an ORS 144.110 minimum sentence on a remanded juvenile.
Because the Board of Parole overrode the minimum sentence, this case now is moot.1 We therefore dismiss the . petition for review.
Petition for review dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Burdge v. Palmateer
112 P.3d 320 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2005)
Frey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
948 P.2d 738 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1997)
State v. Jones
844 P.2d 188 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1992)
Wells v. Peterson
844 P.2d 192 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1992)
Wells v. Peterson
826 P.2d 13 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State v. Jones
818 P.2d 1286 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
770 P.2d 57, 307 Or. 506, 1989 Ore. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-noble-or-1989.