State v. Noble
770 P.2d 57, 307 Or. 506, 1989 Ore. LEXIS 110
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided March 14, 1989·No. TC 86C-22355; CA A47047; SC S35807·Published·Cited by 12 cases
Opinion
The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in imposing an ORS 144.110 minimum sentence on a remanded juvenile.
Because the Board of Parole overrode the minimum sentence, this case now is moot.1 We therefore dismiss the . petition for review.
Petition for review dismissed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Noble, 770 P.2d 57, 307 Or. 506, 1989 Ore. LEXIS 110 (Or. 1989).
770 P.2d 57 (State v. Noble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burdge v. Palmateer
112 P.3d 320 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2005)
Frey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
948 P.2d 738 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1997)
State v. Jones
844 P.2d 188 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1992)
Wells v. Peterson
844 P.2d 192 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1992)
Wells v. Peterson
826 P.2d 13 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State v. Jones
818 P.2d 1286 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)