State v. Nixon

1 Wright 763, 1 Ohio Ch. 763
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1834
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 763 (State v. Nixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Nixon, 1 Wright 763, 1 Ohio Ch. 763 (Ohio 1834).

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

The witness has been permitted to go by the party who summoned him, and who applied for the attachment,, because he did go after he gave him leave. He is more in contempt, than the witness.

* Ordered, That the witness be discharged, and that M’llvaine,, the applicant for the writ, pay the costs forthwith, and, if he refuse,, that an attachment issue against him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Wright 763, 1 Ohio Ch. 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nixon-ohio-1834.