State v. Nixon

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Nixon

151 S.W.3d 66, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1387, 2004 WL 2157950

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 28, 2004·No. ED 83436·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Nixon appeals the judgment entered pursuant to the jury’s verdict convicting him as a prior offender of one count of assault in the first degree, two counts of kidnapping, one count of first degree robbery, two counts of armed criminal action, and one count of burglary in the first degree, for which he was sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment totaling 155 years.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no *67 error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only-setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Nixon appeals the judgment entered pursuant to the jury’s verdict convicting him as a prior offender of one count of assault in the first degree, two counts of kidnapping, one count of first degree robbery, two counts of armed criminal action, and one count of burglary in the first degree, for which he was sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment totaling 155 years.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no *67 error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only-setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Nixon, 151 S.W.3d 66, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1387, 2004 WL 2157950 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

151 S.W.3d 66 (State v. Nixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.