State v. Niskromoni

Hawaii Supreme Court

State v. Niskromoni

488 P.2d 329, 53 Haw. 122

CourtHawaii Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 27, 1971

DocketNo. 5017

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 488 P.2d 329 (State v. Niskromoni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Niskromoni, 488 P.2d 329, 53 Haw. 122 (haw 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted of first degree murder after a jury trial in the first circuit court. On this appeal, he urges that the circuit court erred in giving to the jury over his counsel’s objection, an instruction on malice aforethought which repeated the language of HRS § 748-3. The point raised by defendant is well taken. State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110, 488 P. 2d 322 (1971). The judgment appealed from is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted of first degree murder after a jury trial in the first circuit court. On this appeal, he urges that the circuit court erred in giving to the jury over his counsel’s objection, an instruction on malice aforethought which repeated the language of HRS § 748-3. The point raised by defendant is well taken. State v. Cuevas, 53 Haw. 110, 488 P. 2d 322 (1971). The judgment appealed from is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

488 P.2d 329, 53 Haw. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-niskromoni-haw-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack