State v. Niesman

74 S.W. 638, 101 Mo. App. 507, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 412
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 12, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 S.W. 638 (State v. Niesman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Niesman, 74 S.W. 638, 101 Mo. App. 507, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 412 (Mo. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

BLAND, P. J.

The appeal is from a conviction on the following information (omitting caption and signature) :

“Richard M. Johnson, assistant prosecuting attorney of the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction, now here in court, on behalf of the State of Missouri, amended information malms as follows:
“That Frederick Niesman, doing business under the firm name of Niesman Cigar Co. in the city of St. Louis, on or about the sixteenth day of November, 1901, did unlawfully, willfully, fraudulently, and knowingly keep for sale, vend and sell to one S. A. Scolari, certain [509]*509goods, wares, merchandise, to-wit: cigars the exact quantity or number thereof being to this informant unknown ; that the said cigars then and there sold as aforesaid were then and there in boxes such as are commonly1 used for the placing of and packing therein cigars intended for sale; affixed to and upon the outside of the said boxes, then and there containing the cigars sold by the defendant as aforesaid, and in connection with which said boxes there was then and there at the time of the sale aforesaid a forged, imitation and counterfeit label and trade-mark of the Cigar Maker’s International Union of America, a voluntary association and union of workingmen, members whereof are now and have for some time past been engaged in the making, manufacturing, preparing and selling of cigars in and at the city of St. Louis, and the State of Missouri; that the forged, imitation and counterfeit label, and trademark of the said Cigar Makers’ International Union of America then and there upon and affixed to and in connection with the boxes containing cigars as aforesaid and at the time they were sold by the defendant as aforesaid was then and there a forged imitation and counterfeit of the following genuine label and trade-mark of the said Cigar Makers’ International Union of America as the defendant then and there at the time well knew [510]*510that the said forged imitation and counterfeit of the genuine label and trade-mark of the said Cigar Makers’ International Union of America npon and in connction with the boxes containing cigars as aforesaid and then and there sold by said Frederick Niesmann as aforesaid was then and there intended to represent and make it appear that the said goods, wares and merchandise, to-wit:
[509]*509

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Goldsmith
68 F.2d 5 (Second Circuit, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 S.W. 638, 101 Mo. App. 507, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-niesman-moctapp-1903.