State v. Nieman

292 So. 2d 610, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7785
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 1974·No. No. 74-94·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals an order suppressing certain tangible evidence seized following a warrantless search of an automobile which had been driven by appellee-Nieman. We conclude that on the basis of the information then known to the officers conducting the search, coupled with the surrounding circumstances, the officers had probable cause to believe that the automobile contained contraband and thus the search was not illegal. Carroll v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543; State v. Miller, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 352; State v. Sanders, Fla.App. 1970, 239 So.2d 120.

The order granting the motion to suppress is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Nieman, 292 So. 2d 610, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7785 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

292 So. 2d 610 (State v. Nieman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hall
352 So. 2d 940 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Hardwicke Companies, Incorporated v. Freed
292 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)