State v. Nieberg
117 A. 262, 97 N.J.L. 348, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 209
Opinion
The same questions, decided in State v. Solomon, No. 44 of the November term, 1921, and' which resulted in a reversal of the judgment in that case> were involved in the present case, and1, consequently, under the decision referred to the present judgment must be reversed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Williams, JJ. 3.
F-or r&uersal — Sway.ze, Parker, JIinturn, Ivalisch, Black, White, Hbppenheimer, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 9.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Nieberg, 117 A. 262, 97 N.J.L. 348, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 209 (N.J. 1922).
117 A. 262 (State v. Nieberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Galazan v. Connecticut Housing Fin., No. Cv91 050 39 51 (Jun. 12, 1992)
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 5854 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1992)
Looger v. Reynolds
324 N.E.2d 238 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)