State v. Nickerson

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

State v. Nickerson

313 A.2d 386, 112 R.I. 937, 1974 R.I. LEXIS 1527

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided January 15, 1974·No. C. A. No. 1875·Published

Opinion

Plaintiff ordered to appear on February .8,1974. at 9:30 a. m. to show cause why the motion to .hold in abeyance in the above-entitled matter should not be dismissed - for ■ lack of prosecution for [938]*938failure to comply with Rule 16 of the Rhode Island Supreme Court.

Richard J. Israel, Attorney General, Donald P. Ryan, Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. Bevilacqua & Cicilline, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff ordered to appear on February .8,1974. at 9:30 a. m. to show cause why the motion to .hold in abeyance in the above-entitled matter should not be dismissed - for ■ lack of prosecution for [938]*938failure to comply with Rule 16 of the Rhode Island Supreme Court.

Richard J. Israel, Attorney General, Donald P. Ryan, Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. Bevilacqua & Cicilline, for defendant.

State v. Nickerson, 313 A.2d 386, 112 R.I. 937, 1974 R.I. LEXIS 1527 (R.I. 1974).

Pincite

313 A.2d 386 (State v. Nickerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.