State v. Nickerson
This text of 510 A.2d 1069 (State v. Nickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Donald B. Nickerson appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Oxford County, entered on a jury verdict of guilty of robbery in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 651(1)(C) (1983). He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support findings that he used physical force, and that physical force, if any, was used with the required intent. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we hold that the trier of fact rationally could find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense charged. See State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
510 A.2d 1069, 1986 Me. LEXIS 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nickerson-me-1986.