State v. Nickell

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Nickell

540 S.W.3d 863

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 6, 2018

DocketWD 80023

StatusPublished

This text of 540 S.W.3d 863 (State v. Nickell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Nickell, 540 S.W.3d 863 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

Ronald Nickell ("Nickell") appeals his conviction following a jury trial for attempted enticement of a child, section 566.151, following a jury trial in the circuit court of Adair County, Missouri. Nickell raised only one point on appeal that the trial court erred in overruling his objection to the admission of the transcripts of his online conversations because the transcripts violated the best evidence rule. Specifically, Nickell contends that the transcripts admitted into evidence were copied from Facebook messages without the emojis and thus were not an exact or true reflection of the conversation. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum *864provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Ronald Nickell ("Nickell") appeals his conviction following a jury trial for attempted enticement of a child, section 566.151, following a jury trial in the circuit court of Adair County, Missouri. Nickell raised only one point on appeal that the trial court erred in overruling his objection to the admission of the transcripts of his online conversations because the transcripts violated the best evidence rule. Specifically, Nickell contends that the transcripts admitted into evidence were copied from Facebook messages without the emojis and thus were not an exact or true reflection of the conversation. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum *864provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 S.W.3d 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nickell-moctapp-2018.