State v. Nickel

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Nickel

2011 Ohio 739, 128 Ohio St. 3d 353

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 22, 2011·No. 2010-2131·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Nickel, 2011 Ohio 739, 128 Ohio St. 3d 353 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

2011 Ohio 739 (State v. Nickel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related