State v. Nichols

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

State v. Nichols

58 N.H. 41

DecidedDecember 5, 1876

StatusPublished

This text of 58 N.H. 41 (State v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Nichols, 58 N.H. 41 (N.H. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

Stanley, J.

A day certain being named, and the continuando being rejected as surplusage, the indictment is good. People v. Adams, 17 Wend. 475; Cook v. State, 11 Ga. 53; King v. Kixon, 10 Mod. 335; State v. La Coste, 2 Mason 129; Hawkins P. C., B. 2, c. 25, ss. 32, 74.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stanley, J.

A day certain being named, and the continuando being rejected as surplusage, the indictment is good. People v. Adams, 17 Wend. 475; Cook v. State, 11 Ga. 53; King v. Kixon, 10 Mod. 335; State v. La Coste, 2 Mason 129; Hawkins P. C., B. 2, c. 25, ss. 32, 74.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.H. 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nichols-nh-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack