State v. Nichols

86 S.E.2d 202, 241 N.C. 615, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 429
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 9, 1955
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 86 S.E.2d 202 (State v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Nichols, 86 S.E.2d 202, 241 N.C. 615, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 429 (N.C. 1955).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant excepts to and assigns as error the refusal of the court below to permit him to testify to the effect that he employed a lawyer to obtain a divorce for him and was informed that it would require about thirty days to do so; that after the expiration of thirty days from that time, he went home and got married, believing that he was divorced. The exception is without merit.

In the trial below we find no error.

No error.

Barnhill, C. J., and DeviN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lazenby v. Godwin
271 S.E.2d 69 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 S.E.2d 202, 241 N.C. 615, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nichols-nc-1955.