State v. Nichols

864 S.W.2d 433, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1736, 1993 WL 453616
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Nichols. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1809
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 9, 1993·No. No. 62632·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance and sentence as a prior offender to two years of probation after the court suspended execution of Defendant’s five-year sentence.

We find the trial court did not plainly err in submitting Instruction No. 4, modeled after MAI-CR3d 302.04. That instruction does not operate to deny Defendant due process and is not constitutionally infirm. State v. Griffin, 848 S.W.2d 464, 468-69 (Mo. banc 1993).

We further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in this matter and dispose of it by summary order. Rule 30.25(b).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Nichols, 864 S.W.2d 433, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1736, 1993 WL 453616 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

864 S.W.2d 433 (State v. Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Griffin
848 S.W.2d 464 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1993)